The Parliament of Bats was called in 1426. When I first noticed the name, I pictured this:
but naturally, it was not a batty Parliament.
It was an argument about freedom to carry weapons for self-defense. The Duke of Gloucester had made a rule that members of Parliament were not allowed to carry swords. So they armed themselves with clubs (bats) instead.
I started noticing some of the strange names that various sessions of the English Parliament acquired throughout history. The Mad Parliament, called in 1258, brought to mind this:
but naturally, the Parliament was not nutty, or crazy.
They were very angry (mad, in fact) and they summoned the King (rather than the other way around) to Oxford, where they imposed what became known as the Oxford Provisions, limiting the arbitrary power of the king. The Provisions specified that King Henry keep to the agreement signed by King John known as Magna Carta [now you just knew we'd be getting back to Runnymede with this, didn't you?]. Well, like Magna Carta, the Provisions of Oxford were undone in short order - but the English are a stubborn bunch, and it didn't matter what they named it, they kept telling the king they had rights and would insist on them.
So the Parliament of Bats wasn't batty, and the Mad Parliament wasn't nuts. Next: a more ominous name "The Parliament of Fire and Faggots".
PandaBaby is True Fiction.
Welcome to my Pandababy Blog. A panda bear is an unlikely animal - a bear that eats bamboo - a contradiction in every aspect. This blog is true fiction, also a contradiction in its essence. Yet both are real, both exist - the bear and the blog. Both can only be described by contradictory terms, such as true fiction. Please be pleased to enjoy these stories of our ancestors. They are True Fiction. Every person in my blog lived in the time and place indicated. They are my ancestors and relatives, and their friends.
Friday, August 17, 2012
Thursday, August 9, 2012
Sir Nicholas de Segrave - 1238-1295
sable a lion rampant argent
Sir Nicholas de Segrave changed his arms from those his father bore to those pictured above
sable three garbs argent
The arms borne by Sir Nicholas' ancestors are pictured above. They represent three sheaves of wheat.
They were borne by Gilbert de Segrave who was Nicholas' father.
Sir Nicholas de Segrave fought by the side of Simon de Montfort at the battle of Evesham in 1265. He was severely wounded. Later he withdrew with a group holding out on the Island of Ely, and was still carrying on the struggle against tyranny in 1267. He was excommunicated three times between 1263 and 1267 for fighting against the king. Eventually he reconciled with Henry III and his son Edward.
The Segraves are direct ancestors of April.
Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Sir Hugh le Despenser and Sir Ralph Basset
When Sir Simon de Montfort saw the overwhelming array of force that Edward had brought against him, he is reputed to have said, "Now let us commend our souls to God; for our bodies are our enemies." (1)
He also urged those with him to flee and save themselves for better service to England, but the only deserters were the foreign troops who had made common cause with Montfort. Simon and those around him fought to the death. The shields of two who fought and died next to Simon are:
Leo is a direct descendant of (2) Sir Hugh le Despenser (1223-1265), whose arms above are blazoned as:
Quarterly argent and gules fretty Or overall a bendlet sable
Leo and April are both related, though not in direct ascendency, to (3) Sir Ralph Basset (-1265) who might have borne the arms, below, which are blazoned as:
Or three piles meeting in base gules, a canton ermine
(1) Life of Simon de Montfort, Mandell Creighton, D.D.; c. 1895 London, England.
(2) Dering Roll #214 Thanks to Brian Timms for sharing his fabulous collection of shields
(3) Foster Roll #47 Thanks to Brian Timms for sharing his fabulous collection of shields
He also urged those with him to flee and save themselves for better service to England, but the only deserters were the foreign troops who had made common cause with Montfort. Simon and those around him fought to the death. The shields of two who fought and died next to Simon are:
Leo is a direct descendant of (2) Sir Hugh le Despenser (1223-1265), whose arms above are blazoned as:
Quarterly argent and gules fretty Or overall a bendlet sable
Leo and April are both related, though not in direct ascendency, to (3) Sir Ralph Basset (-1265) who might have borne the arms, below, which are blazoned as:
Or three piles meeting in base gules, a canton ermine
(1) Life of Simon de Montfort, Mandell Creighton, D.D.; c. 1895 London, England.
(2) Dering Roll #214 Thanks to Brian Timms for sharing his fabulous collection of shields
(3) Foster Roll #47 Thanks to Brian Timms for sharing his fabulous collection of shields
Tuesday, August 7, 2012
Some random thoughts on blazon, and a new series of Shields
Arms were not always carried down through a family in the same form as they were originally. If that were the case, the study of heraldry would not be nearly as interesting as it is. Finding a family name that is carried down to fourth 'Ralph' or the tenth 'William' creates additional complexity, for most armorial rolls span several decades, prompting the question - which arms go with which knight, when they are all named Robert and their lifespans overlapped closely?
This is why in the following series of arms, some are modified with "Might have been" borne by.... Although I make every effort to correctly match the arms to the correct knight, there is room for confusion. Anyone who can offer positive identification with sources is very welcome to comment -- please!
The five knights in this series were connected through common cause against King Henry III and the foreign clerics of the Roman church, who were violating tradition and law and enriching themselves with taxes meant for the benefit of the kingdom and the people.
Leo and April are both related, though not in direct ascendency, to Sir Simon de Montfort, 2nd Earl of Leicester. He might have borne these arms at the Battle of Lewes in 1264 --
gules a lion rampant argent
Simon had an older brother who probably bore these arms until he died in 1241, and then his eldest son would have the same arms until his death in 1249. Simon's nephew left no male heir so Simon might have rightfully borne these arms from 1249 until his death 4 Aug 1265 at the Battle of Evesham. The double tail on the lion is an unusual difference on Simon's family shield.
Tomorrow: Sir Hugh le Despenser
Image from Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_de_Montfort,_6th_Earl_of_Leicester
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License;
Origin of picture
Its description comes from La banque du blason et Armorial de J.B. RIETSTAP
Picture drawn by Odejea on October 2005, the 22nd
This is why in the following series of arms, some are modified with "Might have been" borne by.... Although I make every effort to correctly match the arms to the correct knight, there is room for confusion. Anyone who can offer positive identification with sources is very welcome to comment -- please!
The five knights in this series were connected through common cause against King Henry III and the foreign clerics of the Roman church, who were violating tradition and law and enriching themselves with taxes meant for the benefit of the kingdom and the people.
Leo and April are both related, though not in direct ascendency, to Sir Simon de Montfort, 2nd Earl of Leicester. He might have borne these arms at the Battle of Lewes in 1264 --
gules a lion rampant argent
Simon had an older brother who probably bore these arms until he died in 1241, and then his eldest son would have the same arms until his death in 1249. Simon's nephew left no male heir so Simon might have rightfully borne these arms from 1249 until his death 4 Aug 1265 at the Battle of Evesham. The double tail on the lion is an unusual difference on Simon's family shield.
Tomorrow: Sir Hugh le Despenser
Image from Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_de_Montfort,_6th_Earl_of_Leicester
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License;
Picture drawn by Odejea on October 2005, the 22nd
Saturday, August 4, 2012
Throwing the Climate Dice
James E. Hanson is the Director for the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. In 1988 he testified before Congress and showed how, using a mathematical probability program based on throwing 'climate dice', weather patterns could be modeled and predicted.
He is back again, this time to tell us that THE DICE ARE LOADED!
I found his article in the Washington Post easy to understand and vital to know. If you would like to read it for yourself, the link is here.
I never thought that Mother Nature would cheat and use loaded dice, but it appears to be the case. We'd all like to have a peek into the future and see what it has in store for us. Here is your chance - go ahead, peek. I won't tell.
He is back again, this time to tell us that THE DICE ARE LOADED!
I found his article in the Washington Post easy to understand and vital to know. If you would like to read it for yourself, the link is here.
I never thought that Mother Nature would cheat and use loaded dice, but it appears to be the case. We'd all like to have a peek into the future and see what it has in store for us. Here is your chance - go ahead, peek. I won't tell.
Friday, August 3, 2012
News of the World
We interrupt this genealogical blog with an urgent news bulletin:
Yes, the Teddy Bears have reverted to their aggressive origins and have launched a massive air attack on the country of Belarus. The President of Belarus recently bragged about his country's impenetrable air defense system. The Teddy Bears, in retaliation for his hubris, parachuted into Belarus by the hundreds, launched from a single small airplane.
The bears, known and loved for their peaceful, friendly ways, have shocked the world. They have particularly shocked the two Belarusan generals who were fired as a result of the assault.
Although the President of Belarus at first denied the invasion, the bears collective messages of Democracy and hope were too much for him. He admitted the bears had landed, and waving his fists in the air, he declared, 'We shall get those bears!' He also ejected the Swedish diplomats from their embassy, for their part in the bear conspiracy. It seems the plane that carried the Teddy Bears was launched from Sweden.
Sweden retaliated and expelled the Belarusan diplomats from Sweden.
Stay tuned for the latest developments. We are holding our breath, waiting to see if the Panda Bears are going to join this war of nerves, and if so, to which side they will lend their support?
Signing off for Pandababy, I am your reporter on the front lines of the news!
ANNOUNCING THE WAR OF THE TEDDY BEARS!
Yes, the Teddy Bears have reverted to their aggressive origins and have launched a massive air attack on the country of Belarus. The President of Belarus recently bragged about his country's impenetrable air defense system. The Teddy Bears, in retaliation for his hubris, parachuted into Belarus by the hundreds, launched from a single small airplane.
The bears, known and loved for their peaceful, friendly ways, have shocked the world. They have particularly shocked the two Belarusan generals who were fired as a result of the assault.
Although the President of Belarus at first denied the invasion, the bears collective messages of Democracy and hope were too much for him. He admitted the bears had landed, and waving his fists in the air, he declared, 'We shall get those bears!' He also ejected the Swedish diplomats from their embassy, for their part in the bear conspiracy. It seems the plane that carried the Teddy Bears was launched from Sweden.
Sweden retaliated and expelled the Belarusan diplomats from Sweden.
Stay tuned for the latest developments. We are holding our breath, waiting to see if the Panda Bears are going to join this war of nerves, and if so, to which side they will lend their support?
Signing off for Pandababy, I am your reporter on the front lines of the news!
BREAKING! BREAKING! This just in -
After meditating on an especially juicy piece of bamboo, Pandababy asked,
"What is the sound of one hand clapping?"
"It is obvious that bears must stand united, or fall individually. We shall, of course, support the brave and reckless actions of our cousins, the Teddy Bears."
Some Readers have questioned if this story is entirely fiction. Here is a link to the news article from Christian Science Monitor, "Teddy Bear Air Drop Still Roils in Belarus".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)